[task #8213]Port tests in select.rs to sqllogictest#8967
Conversation
comphead
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm thanks @Tangruilin
There is a error for the sql, and others I have all solved. |
6246f08 to
fbf0604
Compare
|
Tests are failing, and btw there is also another PR #8953 |
|
Thanks @comphead! Indeed, we should probably consolidate into one PR, just left a comment here #8213 (comment):
|
d048115 to
4b64db8
Compare
I have solved the failed, you can review it again |
dd3caa6 to
de686a3
Compare
Signed-off-by: tangruilin <[email protected]>
|
@alamb This CR is ready to be review |
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @Tangruilin and @simicd -- I went through this carefully and the only issue I found was that the query parameter test I think can't be written in SQL so needs to part of .rs
Since this PR has dragged out a bunch already, I made the adjustment myself and I plan to merge this PR once the CI passes.
I am really sorry @simicd that we didn't see / prevent this from being implemented in parallel to #8953 and #8939
I will make a PR to the contributor guide to try and make the expectations clearer and hopefully avoid this kind of repetition in the future
|
|
||
| # test_list_query_parameters | ||
| query IIB | ||
| SELECT * FROM query_parameters_table WHERE c1 = 3; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is different than the original test where the parameter is filled in via with_param_value. I will restore it back to the .rs file
.sql("SELECT * FROM test WHERE c1 = $1")
|
I filed #8999 to try and clarify the best practices with contributing |
|
Thanks again everyone |



Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #8213
Closes #8939
Closes #8953
.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?