Merged
Conversation
Jefffrey
reviewed
Dec 21, 2025
Contributor
Jefffrey
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we just need to add some documentation, see an example from arrow_typeof here:
datafusion/datafusion/functions/src/core/arrowtypeof.rs
Lines 25 to 42 in 2c3566c
Contributor
Author
|
@Jefffrey Done. |
Jefffrey
approved these changes
Dec 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #19356
Rationale for this change
This PR implements the arrow_metadata UDF as requested in issue #19356.
What changes are included in this PR?
Added arrow_metadata UDF
Refactored Tests
Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.