-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
Optimizing network.go #129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
in scripts this could cause a lot of print/lines @davidjumani ? |
|
Nope @rohityadavcloud as this is just refactoring the code to be more efficient. There are no additional print statements added |
|
@rohityadavcloud Could you please review / merge this ? I'd like to add a fix for #128 but it would cause a conflict with this |
yadvr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but I don't understand the channel logic - needs testing cc @nvazquez @borisstoyanov thanks
|
cc @davidjumani @nvazquez could you discuss and review if we need this for 6.3 cc @borisstoyanov |
|
Since this is a technical depth, not a feature, I'm thinking to push it for next release. I believe we should merge this after we release 6.3 and start building 6.4 on top of it. That way we'll get a lot more testing done on these changes. @rohityadavcloud @davidjumani please shout if you have any concerns. |
|
Fine by me @borisstoyanov but if this improves the user-experience and is easy to review/test then we should consider to get it in - pl advise @nvazquez @davidjumani |
|
There seems to be a bit of performance improvement, but I don't think it's worth risking, since it does require more testing. vs old way |
looks good ! |
|
Agree, we can merge this after 6.3 is out @borisstoyanov |
|
merging this as all comments point to this being the moment (and also lgtm by Rohit + tested by Wei) |
Uses tickers instead of sleep to optimize waiting after querying an async job