Fix 57.1.0 CHANGELOG to refer to virtual row number support#8903
Merged
alamb merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Nov 25, 2025
Merged
Fix 57.1.0 CHANGELOG to refer to virtual row number support#8903alamb merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
alamb merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
alamb
changed the title
alamb
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @vustef |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax.
Rationale for this change
@vustef pointed out the changelog for 57.1.0 improperly misses the row number support
What changes are included in this PR?
Fix the Changelog
NOTE this doesn't affect the changelog on the 57.1.0 tag -- I will however, add a note to #8800 to lead people there
Are these changes tested?
CI
Are there any user-facing changes?