Skip to content

Conversation

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Mar 20, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

We are moving the object_store to its own crate: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store for easier development.

See this ticket for discussion and backstory

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Remove the object_store code (was ported to https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store along with history in Import object_store, with history, from arrow-rs arrow-rs-object-store#3)
  2. Remove the CI jobs (it was ported in Port .github templates and checks to arrow-rs-object-store crate arrow-rs-object-store#4)

Note I did not update the README.md file. I did that in a separate PR for easier review:

Are there any user-facing changes?

One fewer crate in this repo

Copy link
Member

@lewiszlw lewiszlw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Member

@Xuanwo Xuanwo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice change!

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Mar 22, 2025

I plan to leave this open for the weekend and then merge on Monday unless anyone has concerns or would like more time to review

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Mar 24, 2025

🚀

@alamb alamb merged commit d9b8ba7 into apache:main Mar 24, 2025
31 checks passed
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Mar 24, 2025

Thanks everyone for helping make this happen

@alamb alamb deleted the alamb/remove_object_store branch March 24, 2025 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

parquet Changes to the parquet crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants