Add with_skip_validation flag to IPC readers/writers#7093
Closed
alamb wants to merge 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Closed
Add with_skip_validation flag to IPC readers/writers#7093alamb wants to merge 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom
with_skip_validation flag to IPC readers/writers#7093alamb wants to merge 4 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
7a2613a to
5b8743a
Compare
with_skip_validation flag to IPC readers/writers
Contributor
Author
Preliminary BenchmarksMy hacked up local benchmarks show a 3-9x improvement when disabling validation. |
This was referenced Feb 7, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
Superceded by #7120 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Draft as
create_*_arraymethods intoRecordBatchDecoder#7029TODO:
Rationale for this change
Forcing Array validation for trusted data is inefficient. Users should have the option to avoid this
What changes are included in this PR?
This PR builds on this PR from @totoroyyb
Are there any user-facing changes?