GH-47505: [CI][C#][Integration] Use apache/arrow-dotnet#47508
Merged
Conversation
|
|
Member
Author
|
Worked:
|
Member
Author
|
@adamreeve Do you want to review this to proceed apache/arrow-dotnet#24 quickly? This is the blocker of apache/arrow-dotnet#24 . |
adamreeve
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2025
adamreeve
left a comment
adamreeve
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks good to me thanks @kou.
I tested running archery integration --run-ipc --run-c-data --with-cpp=1 --with-dotnet=1 after checking out the dotnet repository and building it and that worked for me (I didn't include Flight as I have an issue building C++ Flight support on my machine).
Member
Author
|
Thanks. I'll merge this. |
This was referenced Sep 8, 2025
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 982d31f. There weren't enough matching historic benchmark results to make a call on whether there were regressions. The full Conbench report has more details. |
zanmato1984
pushed a commit
to zanmato1984/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2025
…#47508) ### Rationale for this change We're moving the C# implementation to apache/arrow-dotnet. ### What changes are included in this PR? Use apache/arrow-dotnet instead of `csharp/` in apache/arrow. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: apache#47505 Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Mottl
pushed a commit
to Mottl/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2026
…#47508) ### Rationale for this change We're moving the C# implementation to apache/arrow-dotnet. ### What changes are included in this PR? Use apache/arrow-dotnet instead of `csharp/` in apache/arrow. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. * GitHub Issue: apache#47505 Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
We're moving the C# implementation to apache/arrow-dotnet.
What changes are included in this PR?
Use apache/arrow-dotnet instead of
csharp/in apache/arrow.Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.