Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose

Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?

GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

• Other pull requests
• Contribution Guidelines - Contributing Overview

@github-actions crossbow submit preview-docs

Revision: 9292a88

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-4ef5db9166

Task	Status
preview-docs

The problem is that the replace-functions reference does not seem to exist. You can see that no link is generated here: http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/45223/cpp/compute.html

Huh. I guess Sphinx/rST/??? gives sections ids in HTML but doesn't expose that to rST. I've added a label following the naming scheme of the structural transforms one.

@github-actions crossbow submit preview-docs

@github-actions crossbow submit preview-docs

Revision: aaf0d24

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-63bfc892bc

Task	Status
preview-docs

Docs now look good. Not sure what’s up with the 500s. Transient maybe?

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 8f47394.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 3 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.