@bzp2010 Instead of fetching the loki logs in our function in the tests, what if we use https://vector.dev/docs/reference/configuration/sinks/loki/ ? This is being used in tcp-logger, and there are other pull requests to add the same for other loggers as well. What do you think?

@Sn0rt please help to review

LGTM, could you provide the chinese doc?

Hi, @monkeyDluffy6017

Since I'm busy with some other things, I can't afford to finish the Chinese document for now. But I think if the code and test of this PR are fine, we can merge it first, and once it is merged, I will create an issue and mark it as the good first issue, expecting some potential contributor to help finish it.

Hi, @Revolyssup.

I'd like to understand where this essentially lies in terms of consideration.

I don't know much about vectors, but I think it makes sense to track upstream (i.e. Grafana Loki itself). If we use vector to receive logs, we may have to wait for it once the protocol is upgraded.

@Revolyssup please help to check

Since I'm busy with some other things, I can't afford to finish the Chinese document for now. But I think if the code and test of this PR are fine, we can merge it first, and once it is merged, I will create an issue and mark it as the good first issue, expecting some potential contributor to help finish it.

Please remember to create a issue