Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Jul 6, 2020

This reverts commit fd62b1c.


Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]

  • Description above provides context of the change
  • Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation changes)
  • Target Github ISSUE in description if exists
  • Commits follow "How to write a good git commit message"
  • Relevant documentation is updated including usage instructions.
  • I will engage committers as explained in Contribution Workflow Example.

In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.

@potiuk potiuk requested review from Fokko, ashb, feluelle, kaxil and turbaszek July 6, 2020 13:09
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jul 6, 2020

My #9690 was done one commit too late. I have not realized that but this setup update actually did break some tests. :). I think we should revert and reapplying this one after #9690. It would not be great to start the Summit with broken master.

@potiuk potiuk requested a review from mik-laj July 6, 2020 13:12
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jul 6, 2020

    def _dot_lookup(thing, comp, import_path):
        try:
>           return getattr(thing, comp)
E           AttributeError: module 'azure.mgmt.containerinstance.operations' has no attribute 'ContainerOperations'

Copy link
Member

@feluelle feluelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM

@potiuk potiuk merged commit f5e67eb into apache:master Jul 6, 2020
@potiuk potiuk deleted the revert-some-updates branch July 6, 2020 13:27
Copy link
Contributor

@Fokko Fokko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@kaxil kaxil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants