Skip to content

Conversation

@ashb
Copy link
Member

@ashb ashb commented Jun 12, 2020

This is a test fixup to #9187, and updates the possibly existing
imap_default connection, and adds that hook type to the various lists


Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]

  • Description above provides context of the change
  • Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation changes)
  • Target Github ISSUE in description if exists
  • Commits follow "How to write a good git commit message"
  • Relevant documentation is updated including usage instructions.
  • I will engage committers as explained in Contribution Workflow Example.

In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.

This is a test fixup to #9187, and updates the possibly existing
imap_default connection, and adds that hook type to the various lists
@ashb ashb requested review from feluelle, kaxil and mik-laj June 12, 2020 21:22
Copy link
Member

@feluelle feluelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh ya, I noticed this. This was on my todo list for a while. :/

Thanks Ash 👍

@ashb ashb merged commit f90a141 into master Jun 12, 2020
@ashb
Copy link
Member Author

ashb commented Jun 12, 2020

@feluelle with conn_type now being required column (and us not noticing this was a problem cos test weren't passing) it became waay more urgent :)

@ashb ashb deleted the imap-default-conn-type branch June 12, 2020 21:31
@feluelle
Copy link
Member

@feluelle with conn_type now being required column (and us not noticing this was a problem cos test weren't passing) it became waay more urgent :)

I knew of the unique conn_type change but didn't know we merged the related PR already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants