Repository navigation
Conversation
The docstring says the decorator should not be used with @provide_session, but three call sites in airflow-core stack the two, and the combination is the only way to retry a read that needs a session created for it. The real constraint is ordering. The retry wrapper looks up the session when it runs, so it has to sit inside @provide_session; the opposite order raises TypeError because no session exists yet. Signed-off-by: 1fanwang <[email protected]>
|
LGTM |
|
Hello @1fanwang - thank you for your contributions to Apache Airflow! The Airflow community has introduced a limit of 5 open pull requests at a time for contributors without write access to the repository. You currently have 34 open pull requests, so - as a one-time step of introducing the limit - we closed the ones where maintainers have not engaged yet:
These pull requests stay open because maintainers are already engaged in them - they count towards your limit:
This is not a judgement of you or of your changes. We never told contributors before that opening many pull requests at once was a problem, so there is nothing to feel bad about - and nothing is lost: your branches, commits and the review history stay where they are. What we ask you to do is to make your first prioritization decision: choose which of the pull requests above matter most to you, and reopen them (up to 5 open at a time, including the ones still open) with the "Reopen pull request" button or While your pull requests are waiting for review, the most valuable thing you can do is help in other ways - reviewing other contributors' pull requests, helping with issues, and taking part in the discussions on the devlist and Slack. Why we introduced the limit, what it means for you and how to reopen or restore a pull request is explained in https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/contributing-docs/32_open_pull_request_limit.rst. Drafted-by: Claude Code (Opus 5); reviewed by @potiuk before posting |
Contributors following the database-retry documentation are told not to combine retries with automatic session creation. Existing callers already use that combination successfully; reversing the decorator order is what fails.
The docstring now shows
provide_sessionoutsideretry_db_transaction. The retry wrapper needs a bound session so it can roll back failed attempts. This changes guidance only, not runtime behavior.Testing
Executed both orders against the PR's Airflow source and a real SQLite session. The documented order queries and returns 7; the opposite order raises the existing TypeError. No migration or test data is needed.
Runnable example and raw output
From the repository root:
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: GitHub Copilot CLI (GPT-6 Astra) following the guidelines