Conversation
|
Nice! Let's see if CI agrees :) |
|
@potiuk looks like CI agrees 😌 |
Backport failed to create: v3-0-test. View the failure log Run details
You can attempt to backport this manually by running: cherry_picker 634b797 v3-0-testThis should apply the commit to the v3-0-test branch and leave the commit in conflict state marking After you have resolved the conflicts, you can continue the backport process by running: cherry_picker --continue |
|
Hard to cherry-pick that one. I guess (unless we want to cherry-pick some other changes before) we should leave ot for 3.1 ? WDYT? |
* fix numpy serialization order of ops * updating order to respect tuple and pydantic serialization
|
@potiuk I am ok either way. @amoghrajesh what do you think? Happy to try to manually resolve the conflicts if needed |
I think you can try :) - but likely you should first try to find the previous commit that has not been cherry-picked for serialization and apply this first (and then yours) that might be way easier to apply in general). |
* fix numpy serialization order of ops * updating order to respect tuple and pydantic serialization
* fix numpy serialization order of ops * updating order to respect tuple and pydantic serialization
Adjusted order of operations to run custom serialization first before checking if subclass of base object
closes: #54097
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.