[v2-11-test]Correctly treat requeues on reschedule sensors as resetting after each reschedule#52638
Merged
vatsrahul1001 merged 1 commit intov2-11-testfrom Jul 1, 2025
Merged
Conversation
potiuk
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2025
kaxil
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2025
potiuk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2026
…h reschedule (#51410) (#52638) (cherry picked from commit a362101) Co-authored-by: Collin McNulty <[email protected]>
26 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reschedule sensors go into and out of running repeatedly within each try_number. Because the requeue logic allows 3 requeues per try_number, a reschedule sensor that experiences the need for requeues many hours apart can still fail. This PR changes that so that only requeues after the last time the task was running (if ever) are included.
Backport of : #51410
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.