Make test_scheduler_job work locally after moving examples#50917
Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom May 29, 2025
Merged
Make test_scheduler_job work locally after moving examples#50917potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
ed8c97b to
5fd46ff
Compare
Member
Author
|
OK. seems that parts of the |
There was an issue with the test after migrating standard provider examples to ... standard provider (apache#49978) that made the test work only in Breeze and not in local env.
5fd46ff to
b838702
Compare
phanikumv
approved these changes
May 27, 2025
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2025
#50917) There was an issue with the test after migrating standard provider examples to ... standard provider (#49978) that made the test work only in Breeze and not in local env. (cherry picked from commit 21f4a40) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
potiuk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2025
#50917) There was an issue with the test after migrating standard provider examples to ... standard provider (#49978) that made the test work only in Breeze and not in local env. (cherry picked from commit 21f4a40) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
potiuk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2025
#50917) (#51221) There was an issue with the test after migrating standard provider examples to ... standard provider (#49978) that made the test work only in Breeze and not in local env. (cherry picked from commit 21f4a40) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
kaxil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
#50917) (#51221) There was an issue with the test after migrating standard provider examples to ... standard provider (#49978) that made the test work only in Breeze and not in local env. (cherry picked from commit 21f4a40) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>
sanederchik
pushed a commit
to sanederchik/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2025
) There was an issue with the test after migrating standard provider examples to ... standard provider (apache#49978) that made the test work only in Breeze and not in local env.
jose-lehmkuhl
pushed a commit
to jose-lehmkuhl/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2025
) There was an issue with the test after migrating standard provider examples to ... standard provider (apache#49978) that made the test work only in Breeze and not in local env.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was an issue with the test after migrating standard provider examples to ... standard provider (#49978) that made the test work only in Breeze and not in local env.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.