Migrate Exasol provider to use get_df#50017
Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Apr 30, 2025
Merged
Conversation
guan404ming
changed the title
Exasol to use get_df
guan404ming
changed the title
Exasol to use get_dfExasol provider to use get_df
guan404ming
changed the title
Exasol provider to use get_dfExasol provider to use get_df
16 tasks
guan404ming
changed the title
Exasol provider to use get_dfExasol provider to use get_df
guan404ming
force-pushed
the
migrate-exasol
branch
from
810e7cf to
145da69
Compare
potiuk
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related Issue
get_pandas_dftoget_dfinproviders#49334Why
get_pandas_dfdeprecated in #48875, which would be replaced byget_df. Thus, we need to migrate them in providers.How
NotImplementedErrorfor it.cc: @eladkal @potiuk
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.