Clarify UI user types in security model#33021
Merged
Merged
Conversation
uranusjr
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2023
potiuk
reviewed
Aug 2, 2023
jedcunningham
force-pushed
the
sec_doc_fix
branch
from
August 11, 2023 23:15
319e260 to
531e814
Compare
jedcunningham
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 11, 2023 23:17
potiuk
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2023
hussein-awala
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2023
ephraimbuddy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2023
* Clarify op users in security model * Switch the order around (cherry picked from commit f1fad44)
ferruzzi
pushed a commit
to aws-mwaa/upstream-to-airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
* Clarify op users in security model * Switch the order around
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While reviewing the recent security pages revamp pr (#32951), I noticed a few things I wanted to reword. I think this more accurately reflects the state of UI user types.