Refactor Sqlalchemy queries to 2.0 style (Part 4)#32339
Merged
Conversation
uranusjr
approved these changes
Jul 4, 2023
Member
|
applied "full tests needed" to that one as well. |
phanikumv
force-pushed
the
sqla_utils
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 6, 2023 10:57
47e394f to
9d0255a
Compare
phanikumv
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 6, 2023 10:59
phanikumv
requested review from
ashb,
bbovenzi,
dstandish,
kaxil,
pierrejeambrun,
potiuk and
ryanahamilton
as code owners
July 6, 2023 10:59
ephraimbuddy
reviewed
Jul 7, 2023
ephraimbuddy
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2023
syedahsn
pushed a commit
to aws-mwaa/upstream-to-airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a continuation of the effort to refactor the queries to sqlalchemy 2.0
related: #28723
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.