Skip to content

Conversation

@kaxil
Copy link
Member

@kaxil kaxil commented Mar 12, 2021

#14686 fixes an issues with ES logging that should be released asap. Since we just released the providers it makes sense to release this separately.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shall the Changelog section of this file also be updated?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yeah, thanks updated

apache#14686 fixes an issues with ES logging that should be released asap. Since we just released the providers it makes sense to release this separately.
@kaxil kaxil force-pushed the release-es-provider branch from 8a3fe4b to 60c8b4b Compare March 13, 2021 18:16
@github-actions
Copy link

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest master or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Mar 13, 2021
@kaxil kaxil merged commit 662cb8c into apache:master Mar 13, 2021
@kaxil kaxil deleted the release-es-provider branch March 13, 2021 20:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind:documentation okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants