Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Aug 22, 2020

We had to enable mounting from sources for a short while
because we had to find a way to add new scripts to the
"workflow_run" workflow we have. This also requires
the #10470 to be merged - perf_kit to be moved to tests.utils because
it was in a separate directory and image without mounting sources
could not run the tests.

It also partially addresses the #10445 problem where
there was difference between sources in the image and coming
from the master. This comes from GitHub running merge on
non-conflicting changes in the PR and something that will
be addressed shortly.

The issue #10471 discusses this in detail.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the switches-back-not-mounting-sources-for-tests branch 2 times, most recently from 4e0aac8 to 09c62a3 Compare August 22, 2020 10:10
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the switches-back-not-mounting-sources-for-tests branch 2 times, most recently from 90cc8fb to b7c24c9 Compare August 22, 2020 11:48
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the switches-back-not-mounting-sources-for-tests branch from b7c24c9 to ae41168 Compare August 22, 2020 16:00
We had to enable mounting from sources for a short while
because we had to find a way to add new scripts to the
"workflow_run" workflow we have. This also requires
the apache#10470 to be merged - perf_kit to be moved to tests.utils because
it was in a separate directory and image without mounting sources
could not run the tests.

It also partially addresses the apache#10445 problem where
there was difference between sources in the image and coming
from the master. This comes from GitHub running merge on
non-conflicting changes in the PR and something that will
be addressed shortly.

The issue apache#10471 discusses this in detail.
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the switches-back-not-mounting-sources-for-tests branch from ae41168 to dca364a Compare August 23, 2020 10:02
potiuk added a commit to PolideaInternal/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2020
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Aug 24, 2020

@turbaszek -> that one fixes #10445 failure you experienced. We should merge it so others won't have similar problems.

potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2020
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 4fa7df5 into apache:master Aug 24, 2020
@potiuk potiuk deleted the switches-back-not-mounting-sources-for-tests branch August 24, 2020 12:24
potiuk added a commit to potiuk/airflow that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2020
potiuk added a commit to potiuk/airflow that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2020
We had to enable mounting from sources for a short while
because we had to find a way to add new scripts to the
"workflow_run" workflow we have. This also requires
the apache#10470 to be merged - perf_kit to be moved to tests.utils because
it was in a separate directory and image without mounting sources
could not run the tests.

It also partially addresses the apache#10445 problem where
there was difference between sources in the image and coming
from the master. This comes from GitHub running merge on
non-conflicting changes in the PR and something that will
be addressed shortly.

The issue apache#10471 discusses this in detail.

(cherry picked from commit 4fa7df5)
potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2020
Requires #10470 and #10472

(cherry picked from commit 946c9de)
potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2020
We had to enable mounting from sources for a short while
because we had to find a way to add new scripts to the
"workflow_run" workflow we have. This also requires
the #10470 to be merged - perf_kit to be moved to tests.utils because
it was in a separate directory and image without mounting sources
could not run the tests.

It also partially addresses the #10445 problem where
there was difference between sources in the image and coming
from the master. This comes from GitHub running merge on
non-conflicting changes in the PR and something that will
be addressed shortly.

The issue #10471 discusses this in detail.

(cherry picked from commit 4fa7df5)
RaviTezu pushed a commit to RaviTezu/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2020
RaviTezu pushed a commit to RaviTezu/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2020
We had to enable mounting from sources for a short while
because we had to find a way to add new scripts to the
"workflow_run" workflow we have. This also requires
the apache#10470 to be merged - perf_kit to be moved to tests.utils because
it was in a separate directory and image without mounting sources
could not run the tests.

It also partially addresses the apache#10445 problem where
there was difference between sources in the image and coming
from the master. This comes from GitHub running merge on
non-conflicting changes in the PR and something that will
be addressed shortly.

The issue apache#10471 discusses this in detail.

(cherry picked from commit 4fa7df5)
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2020
Requires #10470 and #10472

(cherry picked from commit 946c9de)
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2020
We had to enable mounting from sources for a short while
because we had to find a way to add new scripts to the
"workflow_run" workflow we have. This also requires
the #10470 to be merged - perf_kit to be moved to tests.utils because
it was in a separate directory and image without mounting sources
could not run the tests.

It also partially addresses the #10445 problem where
there was difference between sources in the image and coming
from the master. This comes from GitHub running merge on
non-conflicting changes in the PR and something that will
be addressed shortly.

The issue #10471 discusses this in detail.

(cherry picked from commit 4fa7df5)
@potiuk potiuk added this to the Airflow 1.10.13 milestone Nov 14, 2020
@potiuk potiuk added the type:misc/internal Changelog: Misc changes that should appear in change log label Nov 14, 2020
potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2020
Requires #10470 and #10472

(cherry picked from commit 946c9de)
potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2020
We had to enable mounting from sources for a short while
because we had to find a way to add new scripts to the
"workflow_run" workflow we have. This also requires
the #10470 to be merged - perf_kit to be moved to tests.utils because
it was in a separate directory and image without mounting sources
could not run the tests.

It also partially addresses the #10445 problem where
there was difference between sources in the image and coming
from the master. This comes from GitHub running merge on
non-conflicting changes in the PR and something that will
be addressed shortly.

The issue #10471 discusses this in detail.

(cherry picked from commit 4fa7df5)
cfei18 pushed a commit to cfei18/incubator-airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2021
cfei18 pushed a commit to cfei18/incubator-airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2021
We had to enable mounting from sources for a short while
because we had to find a way to add new scripts to the
"workflow_run" workflow we have. This also requires
the apache#10470 to be merged - perf_kit to be moved to tests.utils because
it was in a separate directory and image without mounting sources
could not run the tests.

It also partially addresses the apache#10445 problem where
there was difference between sources in the image and coming
from the master. This comes from GitHub running merge on
non-conflicting changes in the PR and something that will
be addressed shortly.

The issue apache#10471 discusses this in detail.

(cherry picked from commit 4fa7df5)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:dev-tools type:misc/internal Changelog: Misc changes that should appear in change log

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants