Skip to content

Add Support for GitHub App Installation Authentication in GithubHook #39457

Closed

Description

@kesugano

Description

Enhance the GithubHook to support GitHub App installation authentication.

While the hook currently supports only token-based authentication, adding support for GitHub App installation authentication will provide a more secure option for Airflow users interacting with GitHub.

Use case/motivation

GitHub App installation authentication offers a more secure and granular permission model compared to personal access tokens. It allows for better audit trails and security practices, which are crucial for organizations managing complex workflows on GitHub.

By integrating this authentication method into GithubHook, Airflow users can leverage the benefits of GitHub Apps, such as fine-grained permissions, enhanced security, and improved automation capabilities within their data pipelines.

Related issues

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

Activity

  1. boring-cyborg commented on May 7, 2024

    @boring-cyborg

    Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no need to wait for approval.

  2. eladkal commented on Jun 17, 2024

    @eladkal
    Contributor

    @kesugano will you open a PR for this feature?

  3. kesugano commented on Jun 25, 2024

    @kesugano
    Author

    @eladkal I am submitting my ICLA to the Apache Software Foundation. I will open a PR once it is accepted.

  4. Ethelom commented on Oct 8, 2024

    @Ethelom

    @kesugano Is there any update regarding this?

  5. anandkaranubc commented on Jun 16, 2025

    @anandkaranubc
    Contributor

    Can I work on this issue? Thank you!

  6. jeff3071 commented on Aug 10, 2025

    @jeff3071
    Contributor

    Hi @anandkaranubc , is there any update?
    I’m interested in contributing and would be happy to help with this feature.
    Please let me know if it's okay for me to work on it.

    Thanks!

  7. potiuk commented on Aug 10, 2025

    @potiuk
    Member

    Assigned both of you know - I guess if no response is heard soon, feel free to work on it @jeff3071 -> in the end you can merge the solutions and review each other's code and learn from each other if it happens you work on parallel on it.

  8. liam60 commented on Nov 19, 2025

    @liam60

    @jeff3071 any progress with the PR? Would be great to get Github App support

  9. jeff3071 commented on Nov 19, 2025

    @jeff3071
    Contributor

    @liam60 Sorry for late response. I am working on it now. Will update PR soon.

  10. dym-ok commented on Jan 14, 2026

    @dym-ok
    Contributor

    I'm interested to add support for reading the private key from connection directly (e.g. when connections stored in AWS Secrets Manager).
    Should I raise a new issue, or can I just reference this one in my PR?

  11. Lee-W commented on Jan 15, 2026

    @Lee-W
    Member

    I'm interested to add support for reading the private key from connection directly (e.g. when connections stored in AWS Secrets Manager). Should I raise a new issue, or can I just reference this one in my PR?

    Either way works. If you can raise a PR (even a draft one) quick, then a issue is probably not necessary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions