Skip to content

Comments

feat(color-picker): Support better customization with semantic classNames/styles as function#54962

Merged
zombieJ merged 6 commits intoant-design:nextfrom
meet-student:color-picker
Sep 30, 2025
Merged

feat(color-picker): Support better customization with semantic classNames/styles as function#54962
zombieJ merged 6 commits intoant-design:nextfrom
meet-student:color-picker

Conversation

@meet-student
Copy link
Member

中文版模板 / Chinese template

🤔 This is a ...

  • 🆕 New feature
  • 🐞 Bug fix
  • 📝 Site / documentation improvement
  • 📽️ Demo improvement
  • 💄 Component style improvement
  • 🤖 TypeScript definition improvement
  • 📦 Bundle size optimization
  • ⚡️ Performance optimization
  • ⭐️ Feature enhancement
  • 🌐 Internationalization
  • 🛠 Refactoring
  • 🎨 Code style optimization
  • ✅ Test Case
  • 🔀 Branch merge
  • ⏩ Workflow
  • ⌨️ Accessibility improvement
  • ❓ Other (about what?)

🔗 Related Issues

  • Describe the source of related requirements, such as links to relevant issue discussions.
  • For example: close #xxxx, fix #xxxx

💡 Background and Solution

  • The specific problem to be addressed.
  • List the final API implementation and usage if needed.
  • If there are UI/interaction changes, consider providing screenshots or GIFs.

📝 Change Log

Language Changelog
🇺🇸 English Support better customization with semantic classNames/styles as function
🇨🇳 Chinese Support better customization with semantic classNames/styles as function

@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🧪 Early access (Sonnet 4.5): enabled

We are currently testing the Sonnet 4.5 model, which is expected to improve code review quality. However, this model may lead to increased noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience.

Note:

  • Public repositories are always opted into early access features.
  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Preview failed

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2025

👁 Visual Regression Report for PR #54962 Failed ❌

🎯 Target branch: next (77e7238)
📖 View Full Report ↗︎
📖 Alternative Report ↗︎
📊 Summary: 🔄 1 changed, 🆕 3 added

Expected (Branch next) Actual (Current PR) Diff
table-sticky.dark.png table-sticky.dark.png table-sticky.dark.png table-sticky.dark.png
color-picker-style-class.compact.png color-picker-style-class.compact.png 🆕🆕🆕 Added 🆕🆕🆕
color-picker-style-class.dark.png color-picker-style-class.dark.png 🆕🆕🆕 Added 🆕🆕🆕
color-picker-style-class.default.png color-picker-style-class.default.png 🆕🆕🆕 Added 🆕🆕🆕

Important

There are 4 diffs found in this PR: 🔄 1 changed, 🆕 3 added.
Please check all items:

  • Visual diff is acceptable

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @meet-student, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the ColorPicker component by introducing the ability to define classNames and styles using functions. This allows for highly flexible and conditional styling based on the component's properties, providing developers with greater control over its appearance. The changes include updates to the core component logic, comprehensive documentation, new examples, and robust test coverage to support this new feature.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Customization for ColorPicker: The ColorPicker component now supports classNames and styles props that can accept functions. These functions receive the component's props as an argument, enabling dynamic application of CSS classes and inline styles based on the component's current state (e.g., disabled, size).
  • New Demo and Documentation: A new demo (style-class.tsx) and corresponding documentation (style-class.md, index.en-US.md, index.zh-CN.md) have been added to illustrate this new customization capability, providing clear examples for developers.
  • Type Definition Updates and Test Coverage: The component's TypeScript interfaces (interface.ts) have been updated to reflect the new function-based classNames and styles types, ensuring type safety. New test cases have also been added in index.test.tsx to validate the functionality of these new customization options.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a valuable feature to the ColorPicker component, allowing classNames and styles to be provided as functions for dynamic customization. The implementation is well-done, with corresponding tests and documentation. My review focuses on improving the TypeScript definitions and documentation for these new capabilities to make them more accurate, intuitive, and less restrictive for developers. I've suggested changes to the type definitions in interface.ts to better reflect the intended API and allow for more flexible styling of nested components. I've also pointed out areas in the documentation that could be clarified to better explain the structure of the classNames and styles props.

| allowClear | Allow clearing color selected | boolean | false | |
| arrow | Configuration for popup arrow | `boolean \| { pointAtCenter: boolean }` | true | |
| children | Trigger of ColorPicker | React.ReactNode | - | |
| classNames | Customize class names for each semantic structure inside the component. Supports object or function. | [Record<SemanticDOM, string> \| (info: { props })=> Record<SemanticDOM, string>](#semantic-dom) | - | 5.4.0 |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The documented type for classNames is a bit misleading as it doesn't fully reflect the nested structure of the prop (e.g., for popup). A more accurate representation, such as ({ root?: string, popup?: { root?: string } }) | (info) => ..., would be clearer for users and better align with the component's semantic DOM structure. The same applies to the styles prop.

| allowClear | 允许清除选择的颜色 | boolean | false | |
| arrow | 配置弹出的箭头 | `boolean \| { pointAtCenter: boolean }` | true | |
| children | 颜色选择器的触发器 | React.ReactNode | - | |
| classNames | 用于自定义组件内部各语义化结构的 class,支持对象或函数 | [Record<SemanticDOM, string> \| (info: { props })=> Record<SemanticDOM, string>](#semantic-dom) | - | 5.4.0 |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The documented type for classNames is a bit misleading as it doesn't fully reflect the nested structure of the prop (e.g., for popup). A more accurate representation, such as ({ root?: string, popup?: { root?: string } }) | (info) => ..., would be clearer for users and better align with the component's semantic DOM structure. The same applies to the styles prop.

Comment on lines 106 to 112
classNames?: ColorPickerClassNamesType & {
popup?: Partial<Record<PopupSemantic, string>>;
};
styles?: ColorPickerStylesType & {
popup?: Partial<Record<PopupSemantic, React.CSSProperties>>;
popupOverlayInner?: CSSProperties;
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The current type definitions for classNames and styles are a bit confusing and potentially incorrect. The use of an intersection (&) with a union type that includes a function can lead to a misleading type of function & object. This structure also seems to prevent providing popup classNames or styles from within the function, which limits the dynamic styling capabilities.

To improve clarity and flexibility, consider refactoring these types to represent a choice between a complete object structure (including popup) or a function that returns that complete structure. This would make the API more intuitive and fully support dynamic styling for all parts of the component.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Sep 12, 2025

More templates

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/ant-design/ant-design/antd@54962

commit: 6e03421

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 240 bytes (0.01%) ⬆️. This is within the configured threshold ✅

Detailed changes
Bundle name Size Change
antd.min-array-push 3.76MB 240 bytes (0.01%) ⬆️

Affected Assets, Files, and Routes:

view changes for bundle: antd.min-array-push

Assets Changed:

Asset Name Size Change Total Size Change (%)
antd-with-locales.min.js 120 bytes 2.07MB 0.01%
antd.min.js 120 bytes 1.69MB 0.01%

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (53638e2) to head (6e03421).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on next.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              next    #54962   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          798       798           
  Lines        14749     14750    +1     
  Branches      3896      3896           
=========================================
+ Hits         14749     14750    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

const App: React.FC = () => {
const { styles: classNames } = useStyles();

const stylesObject: ColorPickerProps['styles'] = {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

这个例子直接改成纯圆形,border 为白色看不出来有什么区别:

Image

if (info.props.size === 'large') {
return {
popup: {
root: {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

顺便去掉一下 arrow

@li-jia-nan
Copy link
Member

冲突看一下

@meet-student
Copy link
Member Author

skip 需调整语义化结构

@thinkasany thinkasany requested a review from Copilot September 28, 2025 12:18
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances the ColorPicker component to support better customization by allowing semantic classNames and styles props to accept functions in addition to objects. This enables dynamic styling based on component props.

Key changes:

  • Refactor classNames and styles props to use generic semantic types that support both objects and functions
  • Add comprehensive testing for both object and function-based styling
  • Include documentation and demo showing the new functionality

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
components/color-picker/interface.ts Define new type aliases for ColorPicker semantic styling that support functions
components/color-picker/ColorPicker.tsx Update component to pass merged props to semantic styling system
components/color-picker/demo/style-class.tsx Add demo showing both object and function-based styling
components/color-picker/__tests__/semantic.test.tsx Add comprehensive tests for semantic styling functionality
Documentation files Update API documentation to reflect new function support

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@thinkasany
Copy link
Member

image 冲突了

@meet-student
Copy link
Member Author

image

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Sep 30, 2025
@zombieJ zombieJ merged commit 4afd480 into ant-design:next Sep 30, 2025
39 checks passed
@meet-student meet-student deleted the color-picker branch October 1, 2025 02:47
@zombieJ zombieJ mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2025
17 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants