Repository navigation
fix: file fuzzy search - #2409
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
This video demonstrates it pretty plainly, if I am searching for @complete.go I would expect the top result to contain that string if the file actually exists! When running Screen.Recording.2025-09-03.at.11.18.20.PM.mov |
Rwanbt
pushed a commit
to Rwanbt/unifia
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2026
AIALRA-0
pushed a commit
to AIALRA-0/opencode-turn-engine
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2026
meSingh
pushed a commit
to meSingh/opencode
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All of the completion providers already do ordering, if there is only 1 provider we don't need to reshuffle again.
The most noticeable improvement here is for @ w/ file searches. Because the BE already uses rg to filter/sort w/ the user query, resorting with fuzzy gives worse results
Fixes: #2388