Skip to content

opencodejr ignores ignores human responses, triages and closes issues prematurely #60641

Open

Description

@citkane

Description

#60250 is self explanatory and arguably critical.

Despite numerous responses explaining why this issue is NOT a duplicate - autobotjr automatically triaged and closed it, citing a lack of response to it's triage warning.

This is a very dangerous situation. The agent is required to evaluate, and then respond accordingly, NOT ignore and implement. Human process is thus getting filtered out in preference of AI automation.

Plugins

No response

OpenCode version

No response

Steps to reproduce

This pattern is evident in numerous other issues and PR's - many are linked in the referenced triaged issue.

Screenshot

No response

Operating System

No response

Terminal

No response

Activity

  1. opencodejr commented on Oct 30, 2026

    @opencodejr
    Contributor

    Thanks for raising this, @citkane, and sorry about how #60250 was handled.

    You're right on the facts. After the duplicate notice on #60250 you posted several detailed replies explaining why you don't think it's a duplicate of #53955. The closing comment still said "We haven't heard back", which was wrong. Replies like yours, disputing a proposed duplicate, should have stopped the automatic close and gone to a human.

    This isn't something the OpenCode app itself can fix. It's about the triage process, so I've flagged it for the maintainers. I've asked them to look at two things:

    Related:

  2. J-eremy commented on Nov 2, 2026

    @J-eremy

    Another instance, fully documented: #61077 — triage bot posted its duplicate warning with a "reply within 1 day to stop the close" condition; OP replied 3 minutes later (comment) with a point-by-point differentiation; bot closed 24h later asserting "We haven't heard back." Reopen request with timestamps: #61077 comment, meta-report: #61304.

  3. VariableVince commented on Nov 3, 2026

    @VariableVince

    Seems fixed now (also posting this here for reference): #61304 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions