Skip to content

Clarification on data usage for model training — Go and Zen #35102

Closed as not planned

Description

@AStupidBear

Description

Context: Go and Zen are cloud-hosted AI gateway services provided by OpenCode (Anomaly Co.). When users send prompts through Go/Zen, the requests pass through OpenCode's proxy servers before reaching the downstream model providers.
What's clear: Both Go and Zen docs explicitly state that downstream providers follow a zero-retention policy and do not use data for model training (with listed exceptions for free models).
What's unclear: There is no statement about what OpenCode itself does with user prompts that pass through its servers. The main privacy policy (https://opencode.ai/legal/privacy-policy) lists:
"Other Identifying Information that You Voluntarily Choose to Provide — such as information included in conversations or prompts that you submit to AI"
as a collected category, with the purpose including:
"Providing, Customizing and Improving the Services"
and under "Improving the Services":
"Improving the Services, including testing, research, internal analytics and product development."
This language is broad enough to potentially cover training internal models, but there's no explicit commitment one way or the other.
The question: Does OpenCode (Anomaly Co.) itself use prompts and conversations routed through Go/Zen for any kind of model training or internal product improvement beyond what's strictly necessary to operate the service? If not, would you consider adding an explicit statement to the Go and Zen docs similar to what's already written about downstream providers?
I think a lot of privacy-conscious users would appreciate clarity here. Thanks!

Plugins

No response

OpenCode version

No response

Steps to reproduce

No response

Screenshot and/or share link

No response

Operating System

No response

Terminal

No response

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Jul 3, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    This issue does not fully meet our contributing guidelines.

    What needs to be fixed:

    • This appears to be a Question, but the Bug Report template was used instead. Please resubmit using the Question template and fill in the required Question field with your inquiry.

    Please edit this issue to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.


    This issue might be a duplicate of an existing issue. Please check:

    If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.

  2. github-actions commented on Jul 3, 2026

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    This issue has been automatically closed because it was not updated to meet our contributing guidelines within the 2-hour window.

    Feel free to open a new issue that follows our issue templates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions