You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[FEATURE]: @agent:provider/model syntax to override subagent model on the fly #11215
I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.
Describe the enhancement you want to request
I’d like OpenCode to support an explicit per-subtask model override when invoking subagents, via @agent:provider/model syntax (example: @explore:openai/gpt-5.2).
What I want to add:
Allow users to specify the model for a specific subagent invocation inline, without changing global defaults.
Ideally this is supported anywhere @agent invocations are supported (at least TUI first), with autocomplete for available providers/models.
The chosen model should be stored on the message/subtask metadata so it’s visible/auditable and can be surfaced in the UI.
Benefits:
Lets users pick a faster/cheaper model for simple subtasks and a stronger model for harder ones, per call.
Avoids needing multiple nearly-identical agents just to switch models.
Makes model selection explicit and reproducible when reviewing a session history.
Reacted by katkatfarkat, wv9rtdxnn, Hicham Boushaba and Umeayo Onyekachukwu
These issues all address the core need for per-task/per-command model selection without changing global defaults. The proposed @agent:provider/model syntax in this issue provides an alternative approach to the tiered model system proposed in #6651.
Feel free to ignore if this specific syntax approach addresses a gap not covered by those issues.
Love this idea. Related use case that goes a step further: shell-specialist → summarizer pipeline.
I want to delegate shell command execution (fd, rg, eza pipelines) to a cheap code-specialist model (opencode/grok-code), then have the main expensive model (Opus/GPT-5) interpret and summarize the raw results. Today I achieve this with a custom shell-exec subagent pinned to a specific model, but the @agent:provider/model syntax would make ad-hoc overrides much more ergonomic — especially when I want to temporarily test whether a different model handles a specific subtask better, without editing agent config files.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Jan 29, 2026
This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:
These issues all address the core need for per-task/per-command model selection without changing global defaults. The proposed @agent:provider/model syntax in this issue provides an alternative approach to the tiered model system proposed in #6651.
Feel free to ignore if this specific syntax approach addresses a gap not covered by those issues.
farukg commentedon Feb 16, 2026
Love this idea. Related use case that goes a step further: shell-specialist → summarizer pipeline.
I want to delegate shell command execution (fd, rg, eza pipelines) to a cheap code-specialist model (
opencode/grok-code), then have the main expensive model (Opus/GPT-5) interpret and summarize the raw results. Today I achieve this with a customshell-execsubagent pinned to a specific model, but the@agent:provider/modelsyntax would make ad-hoc overrides much more ergonomic — especially when I want to temporarily test whether a different model handles a specific subtask better, without editing agent config files.github-actions commentedon Apr 18, 2026
To stay organized issues are automatically closed after 60 days of no activity. If the issue is still relevant please open a new one.
RajatGarga commentedon Aug 22, 2026
So is this not going to happen?