fix(contract): check receipt status before contract address in deploy#3654
Merged
mattsse merged 2 commits intoalloy-rs:mainfrom Feb 7, 2026
Merged
fix(contract): check receipt status before contract address in deploy#3654mattsse merged 2 commits intoalloy-rs:mainfrom
mattsse merged 2 commits intoalloy-rs:mainfrom
Conversation
snazzysam933
requested review from
DaniPopes,
grandizzy,
klkvr,
mattsse,
onbjerg and
zerosnacks
as code owners
mattsse
requested changes
Feb 7, 2026
Member
mattsse
left a comment
mattsse
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this makes sense because some clients always return the address even if the tx reverted
smol nit
mattsse
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a contract constructor reverts,
deploy()anddeploy_sync()return the misleading error"missing
contractAddressfrom deployment transaction receipt"because the code only checks
contract_address()without first checkingreceipt.status().adds a
status()check before thecontract_address()check, and introduces a newError::DeploymentRevertedvariant. Now when the constructor reverts, users see "deployment transaction reverted" instead of being pointed toward a missing address problem that doesn't reflect the actual failure.