SDKHooks: Reset global hookid when unhooking in SH.#916
Merged
KyleSanderson merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Oct 28, 2018
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
Other than possibly being a bit surprising, is there any reason for |
Member
Author
sourcemod/public/vtable_hook_helper.h Line 66 in 9abac06 While internally I think we'd be okay this could subtly break plugins if they're storing hookids elsewhere. This would only be an issue on recompilation; but I think it's too late to change this behaviour now (and I like it better as-is, anyways). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an ancient bug in SDKHooks (I actually mailed PM about it before I knew better) where we don't reset the global hookids when we unhook functions. This results in double-frees and oddness when the last users of these forwards unload; and the same or new user comes into the fold using the forward again.
This fixes #912
This is also untested.