Skip to content

Add a note about FormatTime platform dependence#908

Merged
asherkin merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
time-doc
Oct 11, 2018
Merged

Add a note about FormatTime platform dependence#908
asherkin merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
time-doc

Conversation

@asherkin
Copy link
Member

This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.

This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
*
* Note that available parameters depends on support from your operating system.
* In particular, ones highlighted in yellow on that page are not currently
* available on Windows and should be avoided for portable plugins.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought that "operating system" was probably more clear to users than "C standard library".

Copy link
Member

@Headline Headline left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, operating system is good, super clear

@asherkin asherkin merged commit b5320a4 into master Oct 11, 2018
asherkin added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2018
This has been another constant source of confusion since the C99 ones were added to the strftime documentation we link.

It'd be nice to have a consistent implementation inside SM in the future.
@asherkin asherkin deleted the time-doc branch October 11, 2018 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants