-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 464
Closed
Description
This is a github remake of the older Dump call stack request, but I wanted to have some more discussion about it in regards to how it'll look in the SM API, and how it'll actually be implemented. I'm thinking that the usage will look something like this
public void OnPluginStart() {
RequestStackTrace("Some message");
}and the expected output would be something like
L 09/16/2017 - 22:40:21: [SM] Stack trace requested: Some message
L 09/16/2017 - 22:40:21: [SM] Displaying call stack trace for plugin "test.smx":
L 09/16/2017 - 22:40:21: [SM] [0] Line 1, test.sp::OnPluginStart()
L 09/16/2017 - 22:40:21: [SM] [1] Line 2, test.sp::RequestStackTrace()
As far as implementation here are my notes I took while brainstorming. This is where I'd like anyone's criticisms
Looked at the definition for DebugReport::ReportError ; https://github.com/alliedmodders/sourcemod/blob/master/core/logic/DebugReporter.cpp#L158
Looking to either create 'DebugReport::GetTrace(IFrameIterator)', but the problem is that the trace is logged step by step, and not cached at all.
This means that DebugReport::GetTrace would have to return a 2d char array. One column per line of the stack trace. Then I'd have to change DebugReport::ReportError
and have it just loop that array and throw it's contents to logs.
This adds an extra step for DebugReport::ReportError, but also allows us to make stack traces more dynamically. In fact, the presence of a bool 'isIntentional' could
allow us to determine if "Stack trace requested: %s" should be used instead of "Exception reported: %s"
I'd like to implement this myself, but this issue is primarily for discussion & approval from SM Core devs
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels