Conversation
| <vendor>rocksdb</vendor> | ||
| <!--Boolean value. Enable/disable database compression to trade storage space for execution time.--> | ||
| <enable_db_compression>false</enable_db_compression> | ||
| <enable_db_compression>true</enable_db_compression> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For LevelDB the compression made performance fairly bad. Do we have experimental data to show that it's better to enable compression with RocksDB?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can do the benchmark. But base on my understanding, Enable the data compression will increase CPU usage but significantly reduce the data size been wrote into the disk, especially the compacting happens. Also I doubt the leveldb library might use the old version of the native levelDB, So the compression performance is not good. for the benchmark I did before. You can look at the AKI-550.
Also,you can look at the reference link for the details of the rocksdb data compression
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Compression
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, the default setting in rust kernel also enable the data compression.
https://github.com/aionnetwork/aionr/blob/master/db/core/src/dbconfigs.rs#L82-L100
2 participants
Description
Fixes Issue # .
Type of change
Testing