[PR #5928/a341986d backport][3.8] fix: remove deprecated loop argument for asnycio.sleep/gather calls#5929
Merged
Dreamsorcerer merged 1 commit into3.8from Aug 3, 2021
Conversation
5 tasks
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 3.8 #5929 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.52% 96.75% -0.78%
==========================================
Files 44 44
Lines 8865 9852 +987
Branches 1429 1591 +162
==========================================
+ Hits 8646 9532 +886
- Misses 103 182 +79
- Partials 116 138 +22
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of PR #5928 as merged into master (a341986).
What do these changes do?
Remove deprecated
loopargument forasnycio.sleepandasyncio.gathercalls.Are there changes in behavior for the user?
No.
Related issue number
Closes #5905 .
Checklist
CONTRIBUTORS.txtCHANGESfolder<issue_id>.<type>for example (588.bugfix)issue_idchange it to the pr id after creating the pr.feature: Signifying a new feature..bugfix: Signifying a bug fix..doc: Signifying a documentation improvement..removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API..misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.