Describe the bug

Context

We have very specific requirements with our HTTP connections: we expect extremely responsive API and reconnect rapidly if we don't receive responses because we consider it a potential failure.

To facilitate that we use ClientTimeout(connect=1.5, sock_connect=1.0, sock_read=0.5), i.e. yes, if we attempt to read on a socket after sending the request and nothing arrives in 500 ms we consider it a failure and perform a retry.

Problem

This actually works great except when we use the ws_connect for websockets. Having nothing to read for 0.5s of sock_read results in a ServerTimeoutError requiring to retry with ws_connect.

Problem, however, is that ws_connect's timeout and receive_timeout have no effect on the underlying timeout configuration because _ws_connect's call to self.request does not alter the receive timeout for the connection by calling conn.protocol.set_response_params. And after the WSS connection is established, disregarding the ws_connect's receive_timeout the protocol inherits the parent's HTTP connection's sock_read of 0.5.

To Reproduce

Above

Expected behavior

receive_timeout passed to the ws_connect should be observed, by calling conn.protocol.set_response_params with receive_timeout as read_timeout

Logs/tracebacks

N/A

Python Version

N/A

aiohttp Version

Latest stable

multidict Version

N/A

yarl Version

N/A

OS

OS-independent

Related component

Client

Additional context

No response

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow the aio-libs Code of Conduct