Skip to content

Conversation

@tyeth
Copy link
Member

@tyeth tyeth commented Jul 16, 2024

This adds support for passing a list of dicts to send_batch_data, previously it only accepted namedtuple-like things (requiring_asdict() method). To avoid breaking people who use this uncommon method, the implementation switches on whether a list of dicts was passed, or not (namedtuples).

An example has been added to allow people to quickly test it via cpython. It generates 5 datapoints at 1second intervals in the past then batch sends and shows a url to view the feed graph/data.

@github-actions
Copy link

👋 Thanks for this pull request! Unfortunately, it looks like the automated continuous integration (CI) test(s) failed. These can be tricky to fix so we've written a guide on how to fix them locally. It has pages about running pre-commit locally and another about building the docs locally with sphinx. Thanks for contributing to CircuitPython! If you have more questions, feel free to join the Adafruit Discord and post in #circuitpython-dev.

@tyeth tyeth force-pushed the update_batch_send_to_take_dict branch from 12755ed to 26c459f Compare July 18, 2024 10:55
@tyeth tyeth marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2024 11:39
@tyeth tyeth requested a review from brentru July 18, 2024 15:27
@tyeth
Copy link
Member Author

tyeth commented Jul 18, 2024

@brentru this is ready for review

Copy link
Member

@brentru brentru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this implementation but really like the included example. LGTM!

@tyeth tyeth merged commit 99bd004 into main Jul 18, 2024
@tyeth tyeth deleted the update_batch_send_to_take_dict branch July 18, 2024 21:02
adafruit-adabot added a commit to adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Bundle that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants