Skip to content

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Repository files navigation

RAG Implementation and Prompt Optimization

A comprehensive project demonstrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques combined with advanced prompt engineering and optimization strategies.

πŸ“‹ Overview

This project explores RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems that combine document retrieval with large language models to provide accurate, knowledge-grounded responses. It includes extensive prompt optimization experiments and evaluation metrics.

🎯 Objectives

  • Implement RAG architecture from scratch
  • Optimize retrieval mechanisms
  • Fine-tune prompt engineering
  • Evaluate answer quality and relevance
  • Compare different retrieval strategies
  • Benchmark against baseline approaches

πŸ—‚οΈ Project Structure

RAG_Implementation_and_Prompt_Optimization/
β”œβ”€β”€ RAG_Implementation_and_Prompt_Optimization.ipynb  # Main notebook
β”œβ”€β”€ RAG_Assignment_Report.pdf                         # Detailed report
β”œβ”€β”€ *.pdf                                             # Sample documents for testing
└── README.md                                         # Project documentation

πŸ› οΈ Technologies & Libraries

  • LLM Framework: LangChain, LlamaIndex
  • Vector Database: Faiss, Pinecone, Chroma
  • Embeddings: OpenAI, Hugging Face, Sentence Transformers
  • Retrieval: BM25, Dense vectors, Hybrid search
  • Evaluation: BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore, Semantic similarity
  • Framework: PyTorch, TensorFlow

πŸ“Š Key Features

  • Retrieval Methods:

    • Dense vector retrieval (embedding-based)
    • Sparse retrieval (BM25)
    • Hybrid retrieval (combination)
    • Metadata filtering
  • Prompt Engineering:

    • Few-shot learning
    • Chain-of-thought prompting
    • Prompt templates
    • Context management
  • Optimization Techniques:

    • Retriever fine-tuning
    • Prompt template optimization
    • Temperature and sampling parameters
    • Chunk size optimization
  • Evaluation Metrics:

    • Answer relevance
    • Context accuracy
    • Response coherence
    • Factual correctness

πŸš€ Getting Started

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.8+
  • Jupyter Notebook
  • OpenAI API key (or alternative LLM provider)
  • Vector database (Faiss provided locally)

Installation

  1. Clone the repository:

    git clone <repository-url>
    cd RAG_Implementation_and_Prompt_Optimization
  2. Install dependencies:

    pip install -r requirements.txt
  3. Set up environment variables:

    export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-api-key"
    export HUGGINGFACE_API_KEY="your-api-key"
  4. Open the notebook:

    jupyter notebook RAG_Implementation_and_Prompt_Optimization.ipynb

πŸ“ˆ RAG Pipeline

User Query
    ↓
Query Embedding / Preprocessing
    ↓
Vector Database Retrieval
    ↓
Chunk Reranking (Optional)
    ↓
Context Assembly
    ↓
Prompt Construction
    ↓
LLM Generation
    ↓
Post-processing
    ↓
Final Answer

πŸ”§ Architecture Components

1. Document Processing

  • PDF/text extraction
  • Chunking strategies (fixed size, semantic)
  • Metadata preservation
  • Embedding generation

2. Vector Database

  • Faiss for dense embeddings
  • Similarity search
  • VectorStore interface
  • Scaling considerations

3. Retrieval Module

  • Multiple retrieval strategies
  • Reranking mechanisms
  • Metadata filtering
  • Hybrid search

4. Prompt Template

  • Role definition
  • Context injection
  • Few-shot examples
  • Output formatting

5. LLM Interface

  • Model selection (GPT-4, Claude, Mistral, etc.)
  • Temperature control
  • Token limits
  • Response parsing

πŸ’Ύ Configuration

# Retrieval Config
EMBEDDING_MODEL = "text-embedding-3-small"
CHUNK_SIZE = 500
CHUNK_OVERLAP = 100
RETRIEVAL_K = 5  # Top-k documents

# Prompt Config
SYSTEM_PROMPT = "You are a helpful assistant..."
MAX_TOKENS = 2048
TEMPERATURE = 0.7

# Optimization
RERANKER_MODEL = "cross-encoder"
QUERY_EXPANSION = True
HYDE = False  # Hypothetical Document Embeddings

πŸ“ Usage Example

from langchain.embeddings import OpenAIEmbeddings
from langchain.vectorstores import FAISS
from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA
from langchain.llms import OpenAI

# Initialize components
embeddings = OpenAIEmbeddings()
vectorstore = FAISS.load_local("faiss_index", embeddings)

# Create retriever
retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 5})

# Build RAG chain
qa_chain = RetrievalQA.from_chain_type(
    llm=OpenAI(temperature=0.7),
    chain_type="stuff",
    retriever=retriever
)

# Query
response = qa_chain.run("What does the document say about...?")
print(response)

βš™οΈ Prompt Optimization Strategies

Strategy Description Impact
Few-shot Include examples in prompt Improves consistency
CoT Chain-of-thought reasoning Better complex reasoning
Role Priming Define assistant role Focused responses
Constraints Add explicit limitations Quality control
Format Specification Define output format Structured output

πŸ“Š Evaluation Metrics

  • Retrieval Metrics:

    • Precision@K
    • Recall@K
    • MRR (Mean Reciprocal Rank)
    • NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain)
  • Generation Metrics:

    • BLEU Score
    • ROUGE Score
    • BERTScore
    • Semantic similarity (cosine)
  • Human Evaluation:

    • Relevance (1-5)
    • Faithfulness (grounded in context)
    • Completeness
    • Fluency

πŸ” Sample Documents

The project includes test documents (PDFs) covering:

  • Banking and Finance
  • HR and Consulting
  • IT and Technology
  • Entertainment

🎯 Optimization Results

The assignment report includes:

  • Baseline vs optimized performance
  • Impact of different strategies
  • Evaluation comparisons
  • Recommendations for production

🀝 Contributing

Contributions are welcome! Please:

  1. Fork the repository
  2. Create a feature branch
  3. Commit your changes
  4. Push to the branch
  5. Submit a pull request

πŸ“š References

πŸ“„ License

This project is open source and available under the MIT License.

πŸ’‘ Best Practices

  • Test retrieval quality separately from generation
  • Iterate on chunks size based on domain
  • Compare multiple embedding models
  • Regular evaluation on test queries
  • Monitor LLM cost vs performance
  • Cache embeddings for large datasets

βœ‰οΈ Contact

For questions or suggestions, please open an issue or contact the project maintainers.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages