Skip to content

The Unreasonable Code Review Issue Unsettled #87

@clivezhg

Description

@clivezhg

@Ipstenu, you still don't provide a rational explanation on the closing of Wordpress plugin More-Lang:
#79 ,
#80 .

We think most developers are interested in your review motivations, because most of the hosted plugins are violating your code guideliines (as far as my investigations, every hosted plugin are violating). And you were unable to find a least real security issue in More-Lang, only raising issues based on guideline-violation (through machine scanning).

Your motivation to close More-Lang is still a riddle. Might it be racial discrimination? Or just a bad mood? Or district hatred? Anyway, most developers should be interested, because it's related to their welfare.

And Opensourcing is so great in our opionion, that many naive developers tend to believe that you should be fair. We keep warning of unexpected Unreasonable Code Review to avoid naive developers' loss.

You labelled the issues as "invalid" and closed them, and said "because this GitHub repo is literally ONLY FOR THE GUIDELINES. Seriously man, you're in the wrong place", then where is the right place? If you were unable to provide a proper place, we think here is a feasible place.

(BTW, MS has acquired Github, since Wordpress is the biggest competitor to MS' Web tech, we think here is not a right place for you to impose your tyranny, as you do in your Wordpress place. )

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions