Core Data: Add 'supportsPagination' to all appropriate entities#71302
Merged
Core Data: Add 'supportsPagination' to all appropriate entities#71302
Conversation
ramonjd
added
[Type] Enhancement
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the Unlinked AccountsThe following contributors have not linked their GitHub and WordPress.org accounts: @yeetien. Contributors, please read how to link your accounts to ensure your work is properly credited in WordPress releases. If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
ramonjd
commented
Aug 22, 2025
ramonjd
commented
Aug 22, 2025
ramonjd
commented
Aug 22, 2025
Member
|
We should also enable it for individual taxonomies, like Category - https://developer.wordpress.org/rest-api/reference/categories/#arguments. Update: gutenberg/packages/core-data/src/entities.js Lines 383 to 398 in 79e96b5 |
|
Size Change: +15 B (0%) Total Size: 1.92 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
Member
Author
So not a blanket rule in |
Member
|
The |
…ents, and plugins. This is so totalItems and totalPages is correctly set in meta from the X headers
Mamaduka
force-pushed
the
add/entities-support-pagination
branch
from
cc4955e to
bf36045
Compare
Mamaduka
changed the title
|
Flaky tests detected in bf36045. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/17207150523
|
Member
Author
Thank you @Mamaduka |
Member
Author
|
Sorry, folks, I am out of practice, I forgot the following in the commit 🤦🏻 |
priethor
reviewed
Sep 9, 2025
Contributor
priethor
left a comment
priethor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks all, I was going to fix this for taxonomies, so seeing this was a pleasant surprise ❤️
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What? How? Why?
This PR adds the
supportsPaginationproperty to rootEntitiesConfig for user, comment, and taxonomy entities.This is so
totalItemsandtotalPagesare correctly set in meta from theX-WP-TotalandX-WP-TotalPagesheaders.Also, to quote #55164
An example use case would be rendering a dataviews list of comments or users, and accurate totals are required.
See: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/blob/add/entities-support-pagination/packages/core-data/src/resolvers.js#L281
Closes #59520
Testing Instructions
I tested by adding a lot of users, e.g.,
Then I fetched users:
This will return 10 entries by default.
Then I checked the total:
This should return 150 (plus how many users you had already).
In trunk, you'd see
10because that's how many users are in the store.