Introduce a column that shows total CPU time in seconds since process start in process and threads list#37
Introduce a column that shows total CPU time in seconds since process start in process and threads list#37CyberShadow merged 2 commits intoVerySleepy:masterfrom quijote:feature/add-total-cpu
Conversation
Rename column "Thread Usage" in thread list to "CPU". This is more consistent with process list. Rename column "Thread" in thread list to "TID" and move to end. This is more consistent with process list.
|
I can't build Very Sleepy at the moment, but the diff looks good, so I'll merge this. Thanks! |
|
Thank you for merging this so quickly back into master. I was only able to build with VS 2015 Community Edition and wxWidgets-3.1.0. I hope it still works for VS 2010 and wxWidgets-2.9.5. Would it make sense, to upgrade the project to require the newer IDE and library? And what is the workflow for new releases for verysleepy? I still have some additional vague ideas for minor fixes or new features. What are the chances of getting a new official installer published within the next 4 weeks? Is there any documentation that shows how I could build an installer myself? |
Backwards compatibility with older platforms would be something to consider. Newer VS versions regularly drop support for older Windows versions, both in terms of target platform, and as a requirement for installing the IDE itself.
There hasn't been an official release in a while, which should probably be addressed. (On the other hand, I have not observed much demand for one, either.) The closest we've gotten to a release was during ongoing work on MinGW symbol support (provided by the Dr. MinGW project), though at that point users were reporting mixed results in getting it to work.
The InnoSetup script is included (see |
|
Does the ongoing work on MinGW support prevent a release from master in the near future? Is this something that affects the stability of VerySleepy? |
The MinGW work happened a while ago, so it's not really ongoing any more. However, it hasn't exactly concluded either.
Potentially, when debugging MinGW programs. |
2 participants
No description provided.