[Miner][Randomx] Optimised RandomX for each machine#890
Merged
codeofalltrades merged 1 commit intoVeil-Project:masterfrom Jan 19, 2021
Merged
[Miner][Randomx] Optimised RandomX for each machine#890codeofalltrades merged 1 commit intoVeil-Project:masterfrom
codeofalltrades merged 1 commit intoVeil-Project:masterfrom
Conversation
codeofalltrades
changed the title
codeofalltrades
approved these changes
Jan 18, 2021
Collaborator
codeofalltrades
left a comment
codeofalltrades
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ACK de4253d
i7-9700 - getmininginfo
Before 220 hashes
After 1420 hashes
codeofalltrades
added
Algo: RandomX
Tag: PoW
CaveSpectre11
added
Code Review: Passed
and removed
Tag: Waiting For Code Review
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The RandomX miner is running in light mode.
Root Cause
This issue was reported by a third party developer who also decided to submit the patch himself, through Strontium.
Solution
Need explanation
Bounty Payment Address
sv1Unit Testing Results
How to test?