It looks like there's a line in the listaddresses command:
// Only get basecoin and stealth addresses
        if (!((item.first.type() == typeid(WitnessV0KeyHash)) ||
              (item.first.type() == typeid(CStealthAddress)))) continue;
which is strange because the code is already built to handle CStealthAddress a few lines below:

if (item.first.type() == typeid(CStealthAddress)) {

so it looks like it was removed intentionally. I suspect just removing it from the continue block would fix it, but think there's some reason why it was removed in the first place.

Any input would be appreciated as it seems like the fix is simple

Note that this cli command was added in PR #842, and the intent was to give a way to list the stealth addresses; so mining addresses weren't exactly considered; hence the Issue (I think).

The first check was to limit it to stealth and basecoin; the second was to get the information for stealth if stealth, else basecoin. So your PR appears correct to add a 3rd accepted addresstype.

[RPC] listaddresses doesn't include mining addresses #863

Description

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions