Merging to release-5.13: [TT-13727] Add RFC3339 compliant option for consistent GW application logs (#8157)#8179
Conversation
… logs (#8157) <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ## Description <!-- Describe your changes in detail --> ## Related Issue <!-- This project only accepts pull requests related to open issues. --> <!-- If suggesting a new feature or change, please discuss it in an issue first. --> <!-- If fixing a bug, there should be an issue describing it with steps to reproduce. --> <!-- OSS: Please link to the issue here. Tyk: please create/link the JIRA ticket. --> ## Motivation and Context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? --> ## How This Has Been Tested <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes --> <!-- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests --> <!-- you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> <!-- This information is helpful for reviewers and QA. --> ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes <!-- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: --> - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply --> <!-- If there are no documentation updates required, mark the item as checked. --> <!-- Raise up any additional concerns not covered by the checklist. --> - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why (cherry picked from commit 432bcba)
🚨 Jira Linter FailedCommit: The Jira linter failed to validate your PR. Please check the error details below: 🔍 Click to view error detailsNext Steps
This comment will be automatically deleted once the linter passes. |
|
This PR introduces a new configuration option for log formatting to standardize gateway application log timestamps, making them RFC3339 compliant by default. Files Changed AnalysisThe changes introduce a new
Architecture & Impact Assessment
Log Formatting Flowgraph TD
subgraph sg1 [Configuration]
A[tyk.conf: log_format] --> B[config.go: Config.LogFormat]
end
subgraph sg2 [Gateway Initialization]
B --> C["gateway/server.go: initSystem()"]
C --> D["log/log.go: SetupFormatter(format)"]
end
subgraph sg3 [Logging Subsystem]
D --> E{Switch on format}
E --|text or default|--> F[Create TextFormatter with RFC3339]
E --|json|--> G[Create JSONFormatter with RFC3339]
E --|legacy|--> H[Create TextFormatter with legacy format]
F --> I[Set tyk logger & global logrus formatter]
G --> I
H --> J[Set tyk logger formatter ONLY]
end
Scope Discovery & Context ExpansionThe changes are well-contained within the logging and configuration initialization paths. The refactoring in Further work could involve auditing the repository for any other direct instantiations of Metadata
Powered by Visor from Probelabs Last updated: 2026-05-05T15:38:59.193Z | Triggered by: pr_opened | Commit: 80dc4bc 💡 TIP: You can chat with Visor using |
Architecture Issues (1)
Architecture Issues (1)
No performance issues found – changes LGTM. Quality Issues (2)
Powered by Visor from Probelabs Last updated: 2026-05-05T15:38:41.725Z | Triggered by: pr_opened | Commit: 80dc4bc 💡 TIP: You can chat with Visor using |
|



TT-13727 Add RFC3339 compliant option for consistent GW application logs (#8157)
Description
Related Issue
Motivation and Context
How This Has Been Tested
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Types of changes
functionality to change)
coverage to functionality)
Checklist
why it's required
explained why