Merging to release-5.3.0: TT-11485, fix for global rate limit disabled flag not working (#6120) by buger · Pull Request #6128 · TykTechnologies/tyk

buger · 2024-03-08T10:54:33Z

User description

TT-11485, fix for global rate limit disabled flag not working (#6120)

User description

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality to change)
Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test
coverage to functionality)

Checklist

I ensured that the documentation is up to date
I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning
why it's required
I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have
explained why

Type

Bug fix

Description

Fixed an issue where the global rate limit disabled flag was not
properly checked, causing the rate limiter to be incorrectly enabled.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Bug fix

mw_api_rate_limit.go `Fix Global Rate Limit Disabled Flag Check` gateway/mw_api_rate_limit.go Added a condition to check `GlobalRateLimit.Disabled` flag in `EnabledForSpec` function.	+1/-1

✨ PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools
and their descriptions

Type

Bug fix, Tests

Description

Added a missing condition to properly check if the global rate limit is disabled in the EnabledForSpec function.
Introduced a new test case to ensure the EnabledForSpec function respects the GlobalRateLimit.Disabled flag.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Bug fix

mw_api_rate_limit.go `Fix Global Rate Limit Disabled Flag Check` gateway/mw_api_rate_limit.go Added a condition to check if `GlobalRateLimit.Disabled` is true in the `EnabledForSpec` function.	+1/-1

Tests

mw_api_rate_limit_test.go `Add Test for Global Rate Limit Disabled Flag` gateway/mw_api_rate_limit_test.go Imported `apidef` and `assert` packages for testing. Added a new test `TestRateLimitForAPI_EnabledForSpec` to verify the correct behavior of the `EnabledForSpec` function when the global rate limit is disabled.	+11/-0

✨ PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

## **User description**  ## Description  ## Related Issue     ## Motivation and Context  ## How This Has Been Tested     ## Screenshots (if appropriate) ## Types of changes  - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change) - [ ] Refactoring or add test (improvements in base code or adds test coverage to functionality) ## Checklist    - [ ] I ensured that the documentation is up to date - [ ] I explained why this PR updates go.mod in detail with reasoning why it's required - [ ] I would like a code coverage CI quality gate exception and have explained why ___ ## **Type** Bug fix ___ ## **Description** - Fixed an issue where the global rate limit disabled flag was not properly checked, causing the rate limiter to be incorrectly enabled. ___ ## **Changes walkthrough** <table><thead><tr><th></th><th align="left">Relevant files</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Bug fix</strong></td><td><table> <tr> <td> <details> <summary><strong>mw_api_rate_limit.go</strong><dd><code>Fix Global Rate Limit Disabled Flag Check</code>                                </dd></summary> <hr> gateway/mw_api_rate_limit.go <li>Added a condition to check <code>GlobalRateLimit.Disabled</code> flag in <br><code>EnabledForSpec</code> function.<br> </details> </td> <td><a href="https://github.com/TykTechnologies/tyk/pull/6120/files#diff-46326b04f936c839922e970db5c2924156cc797070948f3dc9c589d04661d6d2">+1/-1</a>      </td> </tr> </table></td></tr></tr></tbody></table> ___ > ✨ **PR-Agent usage**: >Comment `/help` on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions (cherry picked from commit 53886d0)

github-actions · 2024-03-08T10:56:16Z

PR Description updated to latest commit (4daef3b)

github-actions · 2024-03-08T10:56:39Z

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and localized to a specific functionality, but require understanding of the rate limiting feature and its implications.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
🔍 Possible issues	Possible Bug: The condition `k.Spec.GlobalRateLimit.Rate == 0 \|\| k.Spec.GlobalRateLimit.Disabled` might lead to unexpected behavior if `GlobalRateLimit.Rate` is intentionally set to 0 to disable rate limiting, but `GlobalRateLimit.Disabled` is false. Consider clarifying the precedence of these flags or ensuring they cannot be misconfigured.
🔒 Security concerns	No

Code feedback:

relevant file	gateway/mw_api_rate_limit.go
suggestion	Consider adding a comment explaining the precedence and intended use of `DisableRateLimit`, `GlobalRateLimit.Rate`, and `GlobalRateLimit.Disabled` to avoid confusion and potential misconfiguration. [important]
relevant line	if k.Spec.DisableRateLimit \|\| k.Spec.GlobalRateLimit.Rate == 0 \|\| k.Spec.GlobalRateLimit.Disabled {

relevant file	gateway/mw_api_rate_limit_test.go
suggestion	Add more test cases for `EnabledForSpec` to cover scenarios where `DisableRateLimit` and `GlobalRateLimit.Rate` are set to different values, including edge cases. This ensures comprehensive testing of the logic changes. [important]
relevant line	func TestRateLimitForAPI_EnabledForSpec(t *testing.T) {

✨ Review tool usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the `review` tool is: `pr_commands = ["/review", ...]` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels The `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible security issues (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag)
Extra sub-tools The `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more.
Auto-approve PRs By invoking: `/review auto_approve` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: `[pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: `[pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5`
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

github-actions · 2024-03-08T10:56:41Z

PR Code Suggestions

Category	Suggestions
Maintainability	Simplify the conditional check by encapsulating logic in a method. Consider simplifying the conditional check by combining the conditions related to `GlobalRateLimit` into a single method call. This will improve readability and maintainability of your code. For instance, you could add a method `IsGlobalRateLimitDisabled()` to the `GlobalRateLimit` struct that encapsulates the logic of checking if the rate limit is disabled either by rate being 0 or the disabled flag being true. gateway/mw_api_rate_limit.go [29] -if k.Spec.DisableRateLimit \|\| k.Spec.GlobalRateLimit.Rate == 0 \|\| k.Spec.GlobalRateLimit.Disabled { +if k.Spec.DisableRateLimit \|\| k.Spec.GlobalRateLimit.IsGlobalRateLimitDisabled() { return false }
Enhancement	Add more test cases for comprehensive testing of the EnabledForSpec method. To ensure comprehensive testing, consider adding more test cases for the `EnabledForSpec` method. Specifically, test scenarios where the rate limit is enabled, and when the rate is non-zero but the disabled flag is true. This will help ensure that the logic handles all possible configurations correctly. gateway/mw_api_rate_limit_test.go [71-75] -func TestRateLimitForAPI_EnabledForSpec(t *testing.T) { - apiSpecDisabled := APISpec{APIDefinition: &apidef.APIDefinition{GlobalRateLimit: apidef.GlobalRateLimit{Disabled: true, Rate: 2, Per: 1}}} +// Additional test cases should be added here - rlDisabled := &RateLimitForAPI{BaseMiddleware: &BaseMiddleware{Spec: &apiSpecDisabled}} - assert.False(t, rlDisabled.EnabledForSpec()) -} -

✨ Improve tool usage guide:

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: `pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]` meaning the `improve` tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the `improve` tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

github-actions · 2024-03-08T10:57:27Z

API Changes

no api changes detected

github-actions · 2024-03-08T11:06:33Z

💥 CI tests failed 🙈

git-state

all ok

Please look at the run or in the Checks tab.

buger · 2024-03-08T11:22:19Z

API tests result - postgres15-sha256 env: success ✅
Branch used: refs/tags/v5.3.0-rc6
Commit: b9375e3
Triggered by: push (@ilijabojanovic)
Execution page

buger · 2024-03-08T11:22:29Z

API tests result - mongo44-sha256 env: success ✅
Branch used: refs/tags/v5.3.0-rc6
Commit: b9375e3
Triggered by: push (@ilijabojanovic)
Execution page

sonarqubecloud · 2024-03-08T11:49:27Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

buger · 2024-03-08T12:41:30Z

API tests result - postgres15-murmur64 env: success ✅
Branch used: refs/tags/v5.3.0-rc6
Commit: b9375e3
Triggered by: push (@ilijabojanovic)
Execution page

buger · 2024-03-08T12:41:45Z

API tests result - mongo44-murmur64 env: success ✅
Branch used: refs/tags/v5.3.0-rc6
Commit: b9375e3
Triggered by: push (@ilijabojanovic)
Execution page

github-actions Bot added Tests Bug fix labels Mar 8, 2024

github-actions Bot added the Review effort [1-5]: 2 label Mar 8, 2024

andrei-tyk merged commit b9375e3 into release-5.3.0 Mar 8, 2024

andrei-tyk deleted the merge/release-5.3.0/53886d044c43930b332dbe4a73cf727069df0770 branch March 8, 2024 12:18

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Merging to release-5.3.0: TT-11485, fix for global rate limit disabled flag not working (#6120)#6128

Merging to release-5.3.0: TT-11485, fix for global rate limit disabled flag not working (#6120)#6128
andrei-tyk merged 1 commit into
release-5.3.0from
merge/release-5.3.0/53886d044c43930b332dbe4a73cf727069df0770

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited by github-actions Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 • edited by github-actions Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

User description

User description

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

Checklist

Type

Description

Changes walkthrough

Type

Description

Changes walkthrough

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

PR Review

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Code Suggestions

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

💥 CI tests failed 🙈

git-state

Uh oh!

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Quality Gate passed

Uh oh!

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited by github-actions Bot

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

buger commented Mar 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading