Skip to content

chore: update providers in readme #1140

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
zerob13 merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2025
Merged

chore: update providers in readme #1140

zerob13 merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2025

Conversation

@zerob13
Copy link
Collaborator

@zerob13 zerob13 commented Nov 28, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation
    • Updated supported model providers list across all README files
    • Refreshed provider icons and links for accuracy
    • Reorganized provider gallery layout for enhanced clarity

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

Three README files (English, Chinese, Japanese) undergo restructuring of the Supported Model Providers section. Provider table entries, icons, and links are updated; featured LLM providers in the main features section are modified. No functional code or logic changes are made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Supported Model Providers Documentation Updates
README.md, README.zh.md, README.jp.md		 Updated provider gallery tables with new/replaced provider entries, icons, and links; modified featured providers list in main features section; restructured provider table layout across all three language versions

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12–15 minutes

Areas requiring extra attention:

  • Verify all icon image URLs and file paths are valid and point to correct assets across all three files
  • Confirm provider links/URLs are accurate and lead to intended destinations
  • Check for broken Markdown table formatting or misaligned cells
  • Validate that provider names and branding reflect current, accurate information

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A hop through the providers, old and new,
Icons sparkle in gold and blue,
From Kimi's chat to clouds so high,
Our gallery grows—let standards fly!
Three tongues, one table, unified pride. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: update providers in readme' directly describes the main change across all three README files, which involves updating provider listings, icons, and links.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/update-providers-in-readme
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f61e3b and 0b725dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.jp.md (4 hunks)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
  • README.zh.md (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings 
Learnt from: CR
Repo: ThinkInAIXYZ/deepchat PR: 0
File: .cursor/rules/i18n.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-25T05:26:43.510Z
Learning: Applies to src/renderer/src/i18n/**/*.json : Maintain consistent key-value structure across all language translation files (zh-CN, en-US, ko-KR, ru-RU, zh-HK, fr-FR, fa-IR)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-check (x64)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (1)

76-76: Provider list in main features is well-curated and consistent across translations.

The updated provider list (DeepSeek, OpenAI, Kimi, Grok, Gemini, Anthropic) is consistent across all three language versions and reflects a good balance of major providers. This aligns well with the PR objective.

README.jp.md (1)

76-76: Japanese translation maintains accurate terminology.

Line 76 appropriately translates the provider list to Japanese without loss of meaning. Provider names are kept in their original form where appropriate (brand names like "DeepSeek", "OpenAI").

README.zh.md (2)

114-272: All icon asset files are present and properly committed to the repository.

Verification confirms that all 33 icon files (SVG and PNG formats) referenced across README.md, README.zh.md, and README.jp.md are present in ./src/renderer/src/assets/llm-icons/. No broken image references or missing assets were detected. The visual rendering of the expanded provider table will work as intended.

115-133: Provider list consistency verified across all language versions.

Verification confirms:

  • ✅ All three README files (README.md, README.zh.md, README.jp.md) contain identical provider lists: 33 providers in the exact same order
  • ✅ Icon file paths are byte-for-byte consistent across all versions (34 unique icon files)
  • ✅ All icon files exist in the repository at src/renderer/src/assets/llm-icons/

The spot-check mentioned in the original comment is accurate. The full pass through all providers confirms no inconsistencies in ordering, naming, URLs, or icon references across language versions.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@zerob13 zerob13 merged commit 77d5c00 into dev Nov 28, 2025
2 checks passed
@zerob13 zerob13 deleted the chore/update-providers-in-readme branch December 13, 2025 06:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@zerob13