Skip to content

fix: support aihubmix nano banana #1104

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
zerob13 merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2025
Merged

fix: support aihubmix nano banana #1104

zerob13 merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2025

Conversation

@zerob13
Copy link
Collaborator

@zerob13 zerob13 commented Nov 20, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features
    • Added comprehensive support for Gemini multi-modal image content in OpenAI-compatible providers, featuring automatic image caching with fallback handling for enhanced reliability.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title 'fix: support aihubmix nano banana' is vague and non-descriptive. While it mentions fixing support for something, the terms 'aihubmix nano banana' are cryptic and don't clearly convey what change was made. The title doesn't relate to the actual changeset, which adds Gemini multi_mod_content image handling to the OpenAI-compatible provider. Revise the title to clearly describe the change, such as 'fix: add Gemini multi_mod_content image support to OpenAI-compatible provider' or 'fix: handle multi_mod_content image data in OpenAI-compatible provider'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bugfix/image-content
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4ee86a and 8f00d1f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/presenter/llmProviderPresenter/providers/openAICompatibleProvider.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/main/presenter/llmProviderPresenter/providers/openAICompatibleProvider.ts (2)
src/main/presenter/index.ts (1)
  • presenter (223-223)
src/shared/types/core/llm-events.ts (1)
  • createStreamEvent (100-154)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-check (x64)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/presenter/llmProviderPresenter/providers/openAICompatibleProvider.ts (1)

1135-1166: Verify property naming against actual AIHubMix API responses before merging.

The implementation follows established patterns, but property names lack test coverage. No test files or response examples validate that item.inline_data and item.inline_data.mime_type match actual AIHubMix API responses. Before merging, confirm:

  • Line 1138-1140: Actual AIHubMix response uses snake_case inline_data and mime_type (not camelCase)
  • The multi_mod_content format is actually returned by AIHubMix in production
  • Test coverage exists or can be added to validate this code path

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@zerob13 zerob13 merged commit 547f64c into dev Nov 20, 2025
2 checks passed
@zerob13 zerob13 deleted the bugfix/image-content branch November 23, 2025 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@zerob13