Skip to content

Conversation

@definitelynotagoblin
Copy link
Contributor

@definitelynotagoblin definitelynotagoblin commented Sep 18, 2025

Description

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Chore (a change that does not modify the application functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Documentation updates are needed, and have been made accordingly.
  • I have added and/or updated tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • My changes include a database migration.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Bumped application version to 2.7.2 for the latest release.
    • No functional changes: features, workflows, and settings remain unchanged.
    • Public API and compatibility are unaffected; no migration or user action required.
    • Update reflects metadata/versioning alignment for packaging and distribution.
    • Stability and behavior are identical to the previous release (2.7.1).

@definitelynotagoblin definitelynotagoblin self-assigned this Sep 18, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2025

Walkthrough

Project metadata updated by incrementing Version and FileVersion in Sharphound.csproj from 2.7.1 to 2.7.2. No other files, settings, references, or code paths were modified. No changes to public APIs or control flow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Version bump
Sharphound.csproj
Updated <Version> and <FileVersion> from 2.7.1 to 2.7.2 only.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ktstrader

Poem

I twitch my whiskers, nod and see,
A tiny tick from .1 to .2—so be!
No code to chase, no loops to test,
Just version hops in tidy dress.
Hop hop hooray, release is due!
🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The PR uses the repository template but leaves the Description, Motivation and Context, and How Has This Been Tested sections empty, so it lacks the substantive information the template expects. Although the Types of changes marks this as a chore and the author checked that tests passed, there are no testing details, CI links, or notes about documentation or required migrations, and several checklist items remain unchecked. Because required template fields are incomplete, the description does not meet the repository's standards for review readiness. Please populate the Description with a concise summary of what changed and why, fill Motivation and Context explaining the reason for the version bump, and provide specific testing details (commands run, CI links, environments) in How Has This Been Tested; also update the checklist to reflect any documentation or test changes. Include links to passing CI artifacts or logs if available and note whether this is a release-only bump or tied to an issue. After those additions the description will meet the template and be ready for review.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "BED-6485 chore: bump version to v2.7.2" accurately and concisely summarizes the primary change (a version bump to v2.7.2) and includes the task identifier and conventional commit type, matching the changes in Sharphound.csproj. It is specific, related to the changeset, and readable for anyone scanning history. No misleading or vague wording is present.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch anemeth/v-bump-2.7.2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Sharphound.csproj (1)

10-10: Use a 4-part FileVersion to avoid tooling warnings.

Windows file version typically expects major.minor.build.revision. Recommend 2.7.2.0 instead of 2.7.2.

Apply this diff:

-        <FileVersion>2.7.2</FileVersion>
+        <FileVersion>2.7.2.0</FileVersion>

If your policy is to keep AssemblyVersion stable across patches, no change needed there. Confirm your build/release pipeline doesn’t emit CS7035 or similar warnings with the current value.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b4b074 and e0ed403.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Sharphound.csproj (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Sharphound.csproj (1)

9-10: LGTM on the version bump.

Version and FileVersion updated to 2.7.2 as expected for a patch release.

@definitelynotagoblin definitelynotagoblin merged commit d53cc04 into 2.X Sep 18, 2025
2 checks passed
@definitelynotagoblin definitelynotagoblin deleted the anemeth/v-bump-2.7.2 branch September 18, 2025 19:29
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 18, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants