Hatched fills for Pie, Coxcomb, and Radar#1948
Conversation
|
I ended up going with a
Some of these may be too far, and make updating to ScottPlot 5 unnecessarily difficult, but I think they're at least worth considering. |
|
My implementation also has more brush allocations (1 per pie slice per render rather than 1 per render), I figured this was cleaner and the performance impact was negligible. I am happy to change it to a more efficient version however, if you decide it's worth it. |
|
Naming is hard! There's a I'm not really worried about performance or nailing naming at this point. This library evolved so much and is strung together in weird ways due to a years-long effort to minimize breaking API changes. Same thing with WebColor 😅 Regarding ScottPlot 5, Thanks for this PR btw - it looks fantastic! |
due to confusion with "web colors" (ScottPlot#1948)
FYI in ScottPlot 5 I'll be keeping the basic API (users create a Answering 100s of questions and closing 100s of issues gave me a lot of insight into what works and what users (and contributors) find confusing, so I'm looking forward to some of the changes! I hope an improved simpler API will make features more discoverable and the code more maintainable 🤞 If you're interested in being more involved in the new API design, I'd be happy to work together on it! |
Purpose:
#1943
Pie:

Cocxomb:

Radar:

I promise they look better than in the screenshots, I used right-click and copy to paste the images in, and that disables anti-aliasing, which might be worth looking into separately.