Skip to content

tests: reorganize infopipe tests by interface#8451

Merged
alexey-tikhonov merged 1 commit into
SSSD:masterfrom
aborah-sudo:rearrange
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

tests: reorganize infopipe tests by interface#8451
alexey-tikhonov merged 1 commit into
SSSD:masterfrom
aborah-sudo:rearrange

Conversation

@aborah-sudo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Group the infopipe tests into logical sections based on the D-Bus interface they exercise:

  • Infopipe (root object)
  • Domains
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Mixed/Combined interfaces

This is a pure reorganization with no logic changes to improve test maintainability and readability.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request effectively reorganizes the infopipe tests into logical sections based on the D-Bus interface, which significantly improves test maintainability and readability as intended. The addition of new tests is also a great enhancement. I have one suggestion to improve the robustness of one of the new tests.

Comment thread src/tests/system/tests/test_infopipe.py
@aborah-sudo aborah-sudo changed the title test: reorganize infopipe tests by interface tests: reorganize infopipe tests by interface Feb 16, 2026
Comment thread src/tests/system/tests/test_infopipe.py
Comment thread src/tests/system/tests/test_infopipe.py

@jakub-vavra-cz jakub-vavra-cz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@aborah-sudo
aborah-sudo requested review from shridhargadekar and removed request for ikerexxe February 17, 2026 08:48
Comment thread src/tests/system/tests/test_infopipe.py Outdated
Comment thread src/tests/system/tests/test_infopipe.py Outdated

@shridhargadekar shridhargadekar left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Group the infopipe tests into logical sections based on the D-Bus
interface they exercise:
- Infopipe (root object)
- Domains
- Users
- Groups
- Mixed/Combined interfaces

This is a pure reorganization with no logic changes to improve test
maintainability and readability.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Vávra <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shridhar Gadekar <[email protected]>
@sssd-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The pull request was accepted by @alexey-tikhonov with the following PR CI status:


🟢 CodeQL (success)
🟢 osh-diff-scan:fedora-rawhide-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:centos-stream-10-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-42-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-44-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 Analyze (target) / cppcheck (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (centos-10) (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (fedora-42) (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (fedora-43) (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (fedora-44) (success)
🟢 ci / intgcheck (fedora-45) (success)
🟢 ci / prepare (success)
🟢 ci / system (centos-10) (success)
🟢 ci / system (fedora-42) (success)
🟢 ci / system (fedora-43) (success)
🟢 ci / system (fedora-44) (success)
🔴 ci / system (fedora-45) (failure)
➖ Coverity scan / coverity (skipped)
🟢 Static code analysis / codeql (success)
🟢 Static code analysis / pre-commit (success)
🟢 Static code analysis / python-system-tests (success)


There are unsuccessful or unfinished checks. Make sure that the failures are not related to this pull request before merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants