You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I investigated the current sandbox architecture. Roomote has provider-neutral lifecycle handling, but the worker runtime itself currently assumes Linux (bash, /sandbox, Linux process/network isolation, and a Linux worker image). A full Windows VM would therefore be a new guest-runtime and VM-provider effort rather than another setting on the existing Docker sandbox.
Before maintainers can turn this into a concrete implementation plan, could you clarify the minimum workflow your projects require?
Could you share one representative project type and its required toolchain, including whether it needs MSVC/Visual Studio Build Tools, a specific Windows SDK, CMake/Ninja, MinGW, or other components?
Is a command-line environment sufficient for building, running tests, and invoking a debugger, or must Roomote expose an interactive Windows desktop/Visual Studio debugging session?
Would Windows Server satisfy the project's runtime/API requirements, or do the projects specifically require Windows 10/11?
What Windows-capable infrastructure do you currently use or expect to self-host on, such as Hyper-V, Azure VMs, AWS EC2, or another hypervisor/provider?
Could you provide an example of the commands and debugging flow that fail under the current Linux/MinGW workaround, including the debugger involved?
The repository maintainers will separately need to decide the supported VM backend, Windows licensing model, isolation guarantees, and initial capability scope. Those are project decisions rather than requirements you need to design.
Please tag @roomote in your response with the details, and we can use them to produce a repository-grounded implementation plan.
Activity
hnrie commentedon Aug 23, 2026
it would be so great if you guys could add Windows OS to sandbox selections!
roomote-community commentedon Aug 23, 2026
I investigated the current sandbox architecture. Roomote has provider-neutral lifecycle handling, but the worker runtime itself currently assumes Linux (
bash,/sandbox, Linux process/network isolation, and a Linux worker image). A full Windows VM would therefore be a new guest-runtime and VM-provider effort rather than another setting on the existing Docker sandbox.Before maintainers can turn this into a concrete implementation plan, could you clarify the minimum workflow your projects require?
The repository maintainers will separately need to decide the supported VM backend, Windows licensing model, isolation guarantees, and initial capability scope. Those are project decisions rather than requirements you need to design.
Please tag @roomote in your response with the details, and we can use them to produce a repository-grounded implementation plan.