Merged
Conversation
sampaiodiego
requested review from
MarcosSpessatto,
d-gubert,
rodrigok and
tassoevan
operator-linebreak new-parens
Member
|
Tests passing are a good sign! :D |
Member
Author
|
yep! :D what is scary is that the new code (following the new rules) is still valid for current rules 😝 |
Member
Im.kinda()
? annoyed
: by(this) |
Member
No indentation? 👀 I.would()
? beOk()
: with(this).though()What about you @tassoevan |
rodrigok
approved these changes
May 10, 2019
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New rules are not yet in this PR, I'll release it before merging.
The rules are being implemented by RocketChat/eslint-config-rocketchat#8
I recommend reviewing by commit.