-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RI-5917-ShowTTL-checkbox-for-hash-fields #3624
RI-5917-ShowTTL-checkbox-for-hash-fields #3624
Conversation
import { EuiButton, EuiCheckbox, EuiFlexGroup, EuiFlexItem } from '@elastic/eui' | ||
import AutoSizer from 'react-virtualized-auto-sizer' | ||
|
||
import VerticalDivider from 'uiSrc/pages/rdi/statistics/components/vertical-divider' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not recommend using here VerticalDivider from rdi statistics components, could you please change it to Divider from common components? Maybe add property to have an ability use vertical
{({ width = 0 }) => ( | ||
<div style={{ width }}> | ||
<EuiFlexGroup justifyContent="flexEnd"> | ||
<EuiFlexItem className={styles.keyFormatter__item}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no reason use BEM since we use scoped styles,
it is better to name keyFormatterItem
…RI-5917-hide-ttl-for-individual-hash-fields
…are-not-aligned RI-5960 fixed borders are not aligned
…-checkbox-not-work RI-5959 fixed showttl not working
…individual-hash-fields' into e2e/feature/RI-5917-hide-ttl-for-individual-hash-fields
…l-for-individual-hash-fields
…dividual-hash-fields
… into e2e/feature/RI-5917-hide-ttl-for-individual-hash-fields
…tl-for-individual-hash-fields E2e/feature/ri 5917 hide ttl for individual hash fields
@romansergeenkosofteq, last commit adds subheader to all types |
The merge-base changed after approval.
@romansergeenkosofteq, this needs to be reapproved in order to be merged |
#RI-5917